another subway lunch
I now eat at Subway once a week, on purpose, whereas before I only did if I was too lazy to pack a lunch that day. Why?
Apples.
Yes, I'm serious. Subway recently began offering raisins or apples as a side option when buying a meal combo (previously, the only choices were chips or cookies). The small bag has a mix of sweet red and tart green apple slices, in a "specially designed bag to lock in their juicy apple crunch."
These apples are so perfect, I swear they must be grown in a lab. They have the perfect flavor and crispness, and I like the variety of sweet and tart. I like them so much, I now crave these apples, hence my weekly trip to Subway. (Insert references to So I Married an Axe Murderer here.)
I've also developed a taste for Diet Coke from a soda fountain, which is the only zero-calorie soft drink I like besides Diet Dr Pepper. As it happens, Subway serves Diet Coke of the fountain variety.
What's with all this talk of healthy food and drink? Well, I have been eating healthier lately, for several reasons. The initial reason was that I decided to audition for Elyria Summer Theatre's Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat, and I felt I needed to lose as much of the gut as possible if I wanted a shot at playing Joseph. However, I wasn't going to kill myself over it, so I didn't join a gym or start running five miles a day. I decided to follow the "energy in/energy out" formula and just reduce my caloric intake. None of this low-fat/low-carb/low-taste stuff.
The results came quickly. I lost 20 pounds in two months, and it has remained steady at that weight. Some of the gut is still there, but that has always been true, even dating back to my near-anorexic days in 7th grade. That likely won't change unless I start working out, but I'm not really worried about it as far as auditions are concerned.
One of my co-workers is taking the opposite approach: eating the same as he does now, but adding exercise to his daily routine. I'm not only too lazy for that, but hate the vast consumptive black hole of time that exercise is; that's a fancy way of saying I have better things to do with my 3 - 4 free hours each night. I'd rather just change what I eat, since I'm going to be eating anyway.
What did I change? Instead of Pop Tarts for breakfast, I have cinnamon toast on whole grain bread, using Splenda instead of sugar. My lunches already involved carrot sticks and an apple, but I stopped including a bag of chips, and drank bottled water instead of pop. That's when I realized my lunches were rather bland and boring without the chips and pop, so I started mixing it up with kiwi and strawberries instead of the apple, for example. (The strawberries are also dusted with Splenda rather than sugar.)
Things that did not change: I still have my one mug of coffee per day, sweetened with sugar. Splenda just doesn't cut it for coffee, for my taste. But coffee has negligible calories, and even with sugar and half & half, this is only about 100 calories total. Still less than a can of pop.
I also eat the same dinners I always have, i.e. whatever my mommy makes.
I stopped snacking almost entirely. This was probably the hardest maneuver, because it was like removing several small meals from the day. At least with breakfast and lunch, I was eating something in place of something else. But after the first week, I got out of the habit of running to the cupboard every time I had a slight twinge of hunger.
I also don't buy into that "if you want a snack, eat an apple instead of cookies" nonsense. First off, eating a lone apple outside the context of a meal often leaves me more hungry than when I started -- Justin says this happens to him too. Secondly, chances are good that when I want a snack, I'm craving a specific flavor or sweetness, which a bland old apple won't fulfill (Subway's apple slices being an exception). And lastly, choosing an apple over cookies won't solve the underlying problem of rewarding every twinge of hunger with a trip to the fridge. That's my view, anyway.
So what was the second reason for this adventure? I simply wanted to see if I could do it. I want to know how much control I can exert over my weight and appearance. Everyone's body is different, so I certainly wouldn't claim that my methods are appropriate for everyone.
I don't know that these changes in my eating habits will be permanent -- in related news, auditions are this weekend -- but it's nice to know that I seem to have a choice in the matter. What's funny is that I don't think I look as skinny as I did when I was this weight in college, which is nice. That may just be mental, though.
Isn't it ridiculous that I had more trouble gaining weight than losing it? Trust me, that's not always a blessing. Exhibit A, ages puberty through senior year of college. QED.
3 Comments:
Ok, so you knew I was going to comment, right? ;^)
Rockin' for you, developing healthier habits! Very cool. And not always very easy to do, but this doesn't sound like it was too difficult for you.
And you're totally right, the way you've done things will definitely not work the same way for others. For example, I tried many of the things that you did pre eDiets, and they didn't work for me. Your approach has actually been found to work well for men, not women. It's a metabolism thing, I think is what I heard. Blech.
Anyway, about the no exercise. You really think I'm working out 3-4 hours a night? Exercise is not a time-eating black hole! Since you have talked a little about being healthier in this post (at least I think you did), I'm going to put in my 2 cents on the working out thing. It's not just a weight thing. It's an all-around well-being thing. So you've trimmed the gut - how about your heart and lungs? I've lost 20 pounds (every inch the hard way), and one of the elements of my new lifestyle that I'm proud of is my increased endurance and stamina. I can take the stairs to my 4th floor apartment without feeling like I'm going to die. I've had to make my workouts more challenging. I don't just want to sit on my couch and watch TV anymore. I actually like drinking water, too, which was never something I enjoyed before.
Anyway, my opinion on the subject. 30 minutes 3 times a week is hardly a huge chunk of my life. And, I definitely don't think it's time wasted for anyone. (and I doubt you do, either, but I'm just saying...)
Keep it up! :^)
The heart is good. :) The lungs, well, we'll have to ask my buddy bleomycin about that one.
I also bought the Cleveland Clinic Healthy Lifestyle Cookbook a few months ago. The first section of the book is about food and activities, while the latter half is full of recipes that work with said lifestyle.
Yeah, I knew that without exercise I wouldn't get "in shape," but that wasn't my primary goal... yet. If I do get cast as Joseph, I will likely have to do more. Having date-specific deadlines like that is a good motivator. :) That's one reason I don't like New Year's resolutions much, because they give you a full year to fall back into old habits, with the reasoning that "I'll try again next January [which is X hundred days away]."
For a few weeks, when I first embarked on this adventure, I did a bit of exercise each night just to burn some extra calories; this was usually only 10-15 minutes and nothing strenuous. I did that for a month, then stopped for reasons I can't recall. And yet, my weight continued to drop and stayed there.
So I'm not going to be running any marathons certainly, but losing the excess 20 still helps. How *much* it helps I think is partly where genetics are going to come in. For example, my dad isn't exactly what one would call "in shape" or even "average," yet amazingly, his blood levels are all fine except for his good cholesterol being a bit low. He also has crazy good blood pressure, much to my mom's envy.
Also, I've found that simply being in a healthy-food mindset makes it easier to make small calorie-burning activity decisions. For example, given the choice between the elevator and one flight of stairs, I'll take the stairs. Those are little decisions that can add up, but it requires a little bit of consciousness to make that choice, for me anyway.
And I think that's probably a big reason why so many people don't exercise: because they think it needs to be a big commitment. Even the Cleveland Clinic book seems to paint this contradiction: first it talks about how it doesn't need to be a big commitment, then a few pages later they're talking about warmups and cooldowns and the various types of exercises you should do... well hmm, if it's "not a big commitment," how will you fit all of that into 15-30 minutes a day? I think *that* is what scares many people off, and they just figure, well if I'm not going to make a commitment to exercising, I might as well eat that extra large double meat pizza too. I don't think we need to think in these extremes, but it seems (to me) like this is all we're blasted with by society and advertising. Ironically, the truth is much more flexible. :)
The way I see it for us nerds is, we can't turn the clock back on technology, and many of us are highly specialized in jobs that simply require long hours of sitting. But that doesn't mean we should just throw our hands in the air and give up on health because some jock is telling us you have to be a runner or kick ass at the gym 2 hours a day to be "healthy." Put in that light, it seems like a hopeless cause, but I don't believe it has to be.
I also meant to mention something we discussed over on the Cadre blog a few years ago: I think many nerds are disinclined toward physical activity because of the negative connotations associated with sports at an early age... being chastized by your teammates because you suck, and being reminded of this fact every time you go up to bat. In school, gym class was often sports- and team-based as well, rather than about personal physical fitness (although I've read some schools are trying to remedy this).
Hence, we have this subconscious notion that "exercise" is some type of competition, and if we fail, someone is going to be judging us. And you know me; I'm Captain of the Anti-competitiveness Club. :)
When the fat guy is working hard at the gym, how many of the other guys are saying "it's obviously not working hurhurhur why bother/why is he out in public"? Vs. how many are saying "wow that's great he's doing something about it"?
It really shouldn't matter what others think, but it's nonetheless a reality for many self-conscious individuals. Some people are able to use that self-consciousness as motivation; others aren't so fortunate.
Post a Comment
<< Home